DeepValue | The New Way Investors Work

TransAct Technologies is not your classic “steady printer company” anymore. Management is trying to pivot the business toward a software-and-recurring-revenue story built around its BOHA! food-service workflow platform, while casino and gaming printers still provide much of the near-term cash. That strategic shift could create real upside over the next few years, but the filings tell a clear story: 2026 is a transition year, not yet the payoff year.

At around $3.58 per share (roughly a $36 million market cap), the stock already embeds an expectation that BOHA becomes a more controllable, higher-margin asset. Yet according to the 10-Q (2025), p.17, TransAct doesn’t expect its own BOHA-hosted environment to go live until early 2027. That means investors are being asked to pay now for benefits that are at least a year away—and heavily execution-dependent.

Our read: this setup is interesting but not quite ready for aggressive capital. The balance sheet provides a liquidity cushion, but the business itself is in “prove it” mode. For that reason, we rate TACT a WAIT, with an attractive entry near $3.10 and a trim zone above $4.30 based on our scenario work.

If you like small-cap special situations where a 2027 catalyst could re-rate the stock, this is a name to track closely—but with strict checkpoints. This is exactly the type of complex, document-heavy story where using DeepValue can help you compress hours of 10-K and 10-Q reading into a few minutes of structured insight.

Quickly stress-test your own TACT thesis with AI that reads the filings, surfaces risk factors, and links every claim back to the source documents in minutes.

See the Full Analysis →

What Does TransAct Actually Do Today?

TransAct develops and sells “software-driven technology and printing solutions” across three main areas:

Food Service Technology (BOHA!) – terminals/workstations plus labeling, timers, and media software, with optional cloud apps
Casino and Gaming – printers and systems like EPICENTRAL that let casinos print promotional coupons in real time at the slot machine
POS Automation and Service – more traditional printers and technical support services

According to the 10-Q (2025), p.16, the company is moving from simply selling hardware into a hybrid model where recurring revenue from labels and software subscriptions sits on top of an installed base of BOHA terminals.

The current revenue mix underlines that transition:

Q3 2025 net sales were $13.176 million, with:
Food Service Technology (FST): $4.841 million
Casino & Gaming: $7.144 million
POS automation: $399k
Technical services (TSG): $792k

Over the first nine months of 2025, net sales were $40.027 million, with casino and gaming providing the largest contribution at $21.492 million compared to $14.510 million from FST 10-Q (2025), p.10.

So while BOHA drives the long-term narrative, casino and gaming is still the cash engine funding the transition.

The BOHA Pivot: Real Potential, But On a 2027 Clock

The core of the bullish story is simple: if BOHA becomes a fully controlled software platform with strong recurring revenue, TransAct can graduate from a cyclical printer vendor to a higher-multiple “hardware + SaaS” hybrid.

To get there, management has:

Acquired a perpetual, royalty-free license to BOHA source code, with a defined transition program
Laid out a migration path that includes:
Delivery of source code
Build pipeline setup
Hosting configuration
Data cutover
90 days of post-migration support

The key timing detail is crucial for investors: TransAct expects its BOHA code hosted “in its own environment” and “fully supported” to go live in early 2027 10-Q (2025), p.17. That means 2026 is essentially a bridge year where:

The company pays transition costs
It still relies on legacy arrangements and third parties
The full margin benefit from unwinding fees is not yet in the P&L

Total cost of the transition is meaningful for a company this size: a $2.55 million source-code license plus roughly $1.007 million in fixed transition services, as flagged in the filings and summarized in the executive overview.

To us, the real risk here is investor timing. The market narrative, as captured by coverage like TipRanks (Feb 2026), has already shifted to “BOHA control” and margin upside. But the filings clearly say: the economics don’t fully show up until 2027, and there are non-trivial migration risks in between 10-Q (2025), pp.29–30.

For value-oriented investors, that mismatch between narrative timing and actual implementation timing is an important red flag. It argues for patience rather than chasing the story early.

How Strong Is BOHA Recurring Revenue Today?

On paper, BOHA already looks like a real recurring engine. In Q3 2025:

FST recurring revenue (software, labels, and other recurring) was $3.254 million
That was +13% year over year
It accounted for 67% of FST revenue

The catch is in the details. Management attributed that recurring increase “primarily” to higher label sales to three existing customers 10-Q (2025), p.20. Meanwhile, FST hardware strength was driven by BOHA Terminal 2 sales to just two large existing customers.

That combination tells us two things:

1. The product works – customers are actually using BOHA labels and terminals, and spend is growing.

2. The base is narrow – the growth is heavily concentrated in a small customer set.

The concentration risk is not theoretical. The 10-K (2025), p.6 discloses that a “significant customer” terminated BOHA service by mid-July 2024, with sales dropping from about $4.0 million in 2023 to roughly $0.9 million in 2024 and minimal label/software revenue in the back half of 2024. That’s hard evidence that BOHA relationships can be lost—and that a single customer can move the needle.

For our team, this is one of the central underwriting questions for TACT in 2026:

Does BOHA recurring growth start to come from many customers, or does it remain driven by a few heavy label buyers?

Management’s own commentary in the next couple of 10-Qs will be very telling. We want to see language shift from “three existing customers” to a broader, more diversified set of drivers.

The Tariff Overhang: Can TransAct Defend Margins?

Another big moving piece for 2026 is tariffs. TransAct is heavily reliant on a manufacturer in Thailand for substantially all of its printers and terminals. As of August 7, 2025, those imports are subject to a 19% U.S. tariff 10-Q (2025), pp.17–18.

Management has been clear:

They are raising prices to pass through the tariff
They still expect the tariff to impact results “going forward”

On recent calls and filings, they’ve guided to a gross margin in the mid-to-high 40% range, helped by higher-margin casino and gaming mix 10-Q (2025), p.22. But our downside scenario work explicitly considers what happens if this doesn’t hold.

In our bear case (30% probability), we assume:

Pricing power weakens
TransAct has to absorb most of the 19% tariff
Gross margin falls to 40–43%
EBITDA turns negative as price increases don’t stick

Given that cost of sales has historically included royalty payments and third-party fees around BOHA, the company is fighting margin pressure on two fronts at once: tariffs and transition costs 10-Q (2025), p.22.

Two consecutive quarters in 2026 where gross margin fails to hold the guided mid-to-high 40s—specifically because tariff pass-through doesn’t work—would be a clear thesis breaker for us 10-Q (2025), p.28. At that point, the bridge to 2027 becomes much riskier because the company would be burning more cash just as its revolver borrowing base could tighten.

This is exactly the kind of multi-variable risk (tariffs, mix, third-party fees) that’s easy to miss if you skim headlines. It’s where an AI research agent that reads filings line by line can add real value to your process.

Let our AI parse the full TACT 10-K and 10-Qs, track tariff and margin language over time, and surface red-flag changes before the market fully reacts.

Try DeepValue Free →

Casino & Gaming: The Cash Engine with Cycles and Concentration

While BOHA is the future, casino and gaming is still paying the bills.

In Q3 2025:

Casino and gaming sales were $7.144 million, more than FST
Management said gross margin improvement was “largely” driven by a higher casino/gaming mix

The business here is cyclical and channel-driven. The 10-Q (2025), p.17 explains that:

2024 saw a downturn as casino customers built excess inventory
2025 showed normalization over the first nine months
Management expects a dip in domestic casino/gaming sales in Q4 2025 because a new customer is overstocked and OEMs signaled slowing demand SEC 10-Q (2025-11-13)

On top of that, customer concentration is real. TransAct “primarily sells casino and gaming printers to Light & Wonder,” which represented 11% of 2024 net sales 10-K (2025), p.8.

For our base case (50% probability), we assume:

Casino and gaming demand stays “stable enough” to fund BOHA transition spending
Revenue roughly tracks the 2025 run-rate
Gross margin holds at 45–48%, supporting modest free cash flow

In the bull case (20% probability), we think casino and gaming remains solid while BOHA recurring really broadens and reduces account concentration, pushing operating margins above 5%.

The key risk to monitor is that casino OEM demand stays weak longer than expected. If the Q4 2025 digestion (overstock and approvals) extends into 2026 without a rebound, the cash engine that underwrites BOHA spending becomes unreliable SEC 10-Q (2025-11-13). That’s why we include casino/gaming demand recovery as one of our 6–18 month checkpoints.

Is TACT Stock a Buy in 2026—or Is It Better to Wait?

From our perspective, the right question for 2026 investors isn’t “Is BOHA a good product?” The filings already show it has traction. The better question is:

Are we being asked to pay today for earnings that won’t arrive until 2027, with real execution risk in between?

At $3.58 per share, valuation metrics (negative P/E, negative EV/EBITDA based on FMP data embedded in the report) tell us we’re not paying up for current earnings. We’re paying for:

The liquidity cushion: $20 million of cash at Q3 2025 and a $10 million revolver with a $0.75 million minimum monthly excess availability covenant, maturing March 2027 10-Q (2025), p.27
The potential 2027 margin step-up once BOHA is fully in-house and third-party fees roll off

But that liquidity cushion isn’t bulletproof. Cash generation in the first nine months of 2025 was helped by:

Inventory reduction from $16.161 million to $11.735 million, freeing up working capital 10-Q (2025), p.10

As volumes normalize or grow, inventory will likely need to rebuild, which could tighten the borrowing base on the revolver. The 10-K (2025), p.17 notes that slow-moving inventory is excluded from the borrowing base and that availability is sensitive to eligible A/R and inventory levels. That’s an important structural constraint.

So we frame TACT not as a stable compounder, but as a liquidity-backed, execution-dependent value situation. That’s very different from a classic “buy and forget” business.

Our rating of WAIT reflects that distinction. We’d rather see proof on two bridge conditions before sizing up:

1. Gross margin truly holds in the mid-to-high 40% range in the face of the 19% Thailand tariff

2. BOHA recurring growth clearly diversifies beyond a few label-heavy customers

If those show up in 2026 filings, the risk/reward shifts more favorably.

What Are the Key 2026 Checkpoints and Red Flags?

To avoid getting trapped in a slow-motion thesis breakdown, we track a set of explicit checkpoints drawn directly from the filings and 8-K disclosures.

90-Day View (Through May 24, 2026)

By the time the next quarterly report is out:

If BOHA recurring growth is still described mainly as “higher label sales to three existing customers” with no mention of broader adoption, we’d treat that as thesis weakness and consider reducing exposure 10-Q (2025), p.20.
If management explicitly quantifies successful tariff pass-through and reaffirms the mid-to-high 40% margin expectation, we’d be more comfortable maintaining or adding on pullbacks 10-Q (2025), pp.22, 28.

6–9 Month View (Through August 22, 2026)

By late summer 2026, we want to see at least one of:

Clear disclosure that “Completion/Project Completion” under the Avery Dennison/StreemSoft transition is on track or achieved, which is what actually unlocks the fee unwind SEC 8-K (2026-01-05)
Evidence that casino and gaming demand has rebounded after the guided Q4 2025 digestion, supporting the funding bridge into 2027 SEC 10-Q (2025-11-13)

If we don’t get either—no progress update on the transition and no real casino recovery—we’d avoid averaging down and would reassess the position size more aggressively.

Structural Thesis Breakers

We’d treat the following as major red flags:

A disclosed BOHA service interruption or migration defect in 2026 that coincides with a slowdown in BOHA recurring growth 10-Q (2025), pp.29–30
Two quarters in a row where gross margin clearly sits below the guided mid-to-high 40s due to tariff price increases failing to stick 10-Q (2025), p.22
Any sign of revolver covenant pressure, like commentary that excess availability is approaching the $0.75 million minimum 10-Q (2025), p.27

This kind of rules-based monitoring is exactly where investors can use automation to their advantage. You can build a watchlist of “must-watch” language—tariffs, completion milestones, customer concentration—and have AI tools flag changes as new filings drop. Read our AI-powered value investing guide to see how platforms like DeepValue can bridge the gap between quick screeners and full manual deep dives.

Management, Cost Cuts, and Strategic Options

We also spend time on management behavior, because small-cap transitions live or die on execution discipline.

The track record so far includes:

A 3Q 2023 cost program targeting about $3.0 million in annual savings, realized in 2024
A 2Q 2024 cost program with roughly $2.0 million of expected annualized savings
A headquarters footprint reduction from 11,075 square feet to 3,630 square feet, with the lease extended to December 31, 2029, lowering fixed overhead

Capital allocation has been deliberate:

9M 2025 capex was just $89k
Capitalized software development costs were $1.352 million
Cash payments for the BOHA source code acquisition were $1.4 million in the same period

That tells us management is prioritizing:

Liquidity preservation
Targeted investment in BOHA control
Leaning into operating leverage if revenue stabilizes or grows

Governance-wise, the 10-K (2025), p.22 explicitly states that the company’s strategic review process remains active, and the Board is “determined to consider any and all options” to create shareholder value. That increases the probability of a non-organic outcome—sale, merger, or asset deal—especially if organic execution stalls.

We wouldn’t buy TACT solely on the hope of M&A, but it’s a secondary element that can matter in downside scenarios. It suggests that if the BOHA transition runs into trouble, the Board may be more willing to pursue structural solutions instead of simply diluting shareholders or stretching the balance sheet further.

Will TransAct Deliver Long-Term Growth?

Long-term, the bull case isn’t complicated conceptually:

By early 2027, TransAct runs BOHA end-to-end in its own environment
Third-party royalties and revenue-share fees decline, improving margins
BOHA recurring revenue continues to grow and becomes more diversified across many customers
Casino and gaming demand remains stable enough to support ongoing reinvestment

If that picture materializes, the combination of higher-margin recurring revenue and a leaner cost base could justify a higher valuation multiple. The filings already hint that contractual simplification should help: the Avery Dennison/StreemSoft agreements can be terminated upon “Completion/Project Completion” with no early termination penalties, removing revenue-share drag SEC 8-K (2026-01-05).

But the durability of that long-term growth depends on:

Successfully navigating defects, missed milestones, and service interruption risk during the migration 10-Q (2025), pp.29–30
Reducing customer concentration in both BOHA and casino
Keeping the balance sheet and revolver covenant healthy while investing for the future

Our base case assumes TransAct threads that needle and reaches early 2027 with an intact BOHA franchise and preserved liquidity, worth around $3.90 per share. The bull case—where BOHA recurring grows >15% annually, spreads across more customers, and operating margin exceeds 5%—could support an implied value closer to $4.80.

The bear case, though, is not benign. If tariffs bite, casino demand softens again, and BOHA migration creates churn or delays fee relief, we can easily get to an implied value near $2.60, especially if revolver capacity tightens at the wrong time.

How We’d Approach TACT as 2026 Investors

Putting it all together, here’s how we’d frame TransAct Technologies in a real portfolio:

Rating: WAIT
Reassessment window: 6–12 months
Attractive entry zone: Around $3.10
Trim/exit zone: Above $4.30
Position sizing: Treat as a liquidity-backed, execution-heavy special situation—not a core compounder

Tactically, we’d:

Track the next two 10-Qs closely for margin, tariff pass-through, and BOHA customer mix language
Watch for any 8-K updates on the BOHA transition milestones and “Completion/Project Completion” timing
Monitor casino and gaming commentary to see whether the Q4 2025 dip is a one-off digestion or the start of a longer slowdown
Keep an eye on revolver usage and borrowing-base commentary for early signs of liquidity strain

This is a name where having a research process that can rapidly re-underwrite after each new filing is a real edge. Instead of rereading hundreds of pages every quarter, you can lean on an AI platform to highlight exactly what changed in tariff language, transition risk factors, or customer concentration disclosures.

Use DeepValue to scan new TACT filings, compare them to prior reports, and instantly see what’s changed in margins, BOHA disclosures, and liquidity.

Research TACT in Minutes →

For now, we’re content to watch and wait. If management proves that margins are resilient and BOHA recurring is broadening well before the 2027 cutover, the upside will come with less risk—and we’d be ready to lean in more confidently.

TransAct Technologies (TACT) Deep Research Report: Waiting For Proof Before the 2027 Pivot Pays Off