DeepValue | The New Way Investors Work

QuantumScape has become one of the purest public-market bets on solid‑state EV batteries. The company is pre‑revenue, burning roughly a quarter‑billion dollars a year in cash, and yet sports a multibillion‑dollar valuation thanks to bold promises around energy density, fast charging, and a capital‑light licensing model with Volkswagen’s PowerCo.

As of late January 2026, shares trade around $8.85, implying a market cap of roughly $5.3B. Our team thinks that price already bakes in a lot of good news that hasn’t yet happened: manufacturable solid‑state cells at scale, successful field testing, and meaningful royalties starting around 2027–2028. Until those pieces fall into place, QuantumScape looks less like a classic value play and more like a long‑dated call option on one particular path to the EV future.

In this article, we’ll walk through what QuantumScape is actually building, how its economics work, what the PowerCo and Ducati deals really mean, and where we see the risk/reward skewed today. We’ll also spell out the specific milestones we’re watching over the next 6–24 months that could either de‑risk the story—or break it.

If you want to compare QuantumScape to other high‑risk, high‑reward technology names without spending days buried in SEC filings, you can dramatically compress that work by using DeepValue.

Benchmark QuantumScape against other battery and EV names in minutes instead of hours using AI‑driven, citation‑backed reports that parse SEC filings and niche industry sources for you.

Run Deep Research on QS →

QuantumScape in a nutshell: what exactly is the bet?

QuantumScape develops next‑generation solid‑state lithium‑metal batteries aimed primarily at electric vehicles. Instead of the conventional graphite or silicon anode and liquid electrolyte, it uses a lithium‑metal anode paired with a proprietary ceramic solid‑state separator to target:

Higher energy density (more range per kg or liter)
Faster charging
Improved safety versus flammable liquid electrolytes

According to the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025, QuantumScape operates R&D and pilot facilities in San Jose and sits in the “technology layer” of the EV battery value chain. Critically, it does not intend to become a large‑scale cell manufacturer itself. Instead, the company wants to:

License its cell architecture and manufacturing processes
Let partners like Volkswagen’s PowerCo, Corning, and Murata build most of the physical capacity
Collect milestone payments and then royalties on each GWh of production

This pivot away from a joint‑venture gigafactory model with VW toward a capital‑light licensing strategy was formalized in 2024, when the old JV was terminated and replaced by a broad IP and industrialization agreement with PowerCo, as outlined in the 10‑K (2025) and in Volkswagen’s own July 11 2024 announcement.

For investors, this architecture means:

Less capex on QuantumScape’s balance sheet
But also lower potential revenue per kWh than if QuantumScape were selling cells directly
And heavy dependence on a small set of powerful partners, especially VW/PowerCo

Recent milestones: Cobra, Eagle, Ducati and PowerCo

The last few years have been all about taking QuantumScape from lab prototypes toward something that might scale.

Cobra separator and Eagle pilot line

On the manufacturing side, the key developments have been:

The “Raptor” separator process, followed by the newer “Cobra” separator equipment
Cobra was introduced in December 2024 and entered baseline production in June 2025, with management claiming ~25x faster heat‑treatment speed and smaller equipment footprint, improving potential throughput and capital efficiency on pilot lines, per QuantumScape, Dec 5 2024 and Jun 24 2025.
The “Eagle Line” is QuantumScape’s automated pilot line for higher‑volume QSE‑5 cell production, now being installed in San Jose. According to QuantumScape, Oct 22 2025, this line is central to proving automotive‑grade yields and uptime.

In 2025, the company began shipping Cobra‑based B1 samples of its QSE‑5 cell (~5 Ah) to partners and installed core Eagle equipment. These steps are crucial—but they are still pilot activities. As the company repeatedly notes in its 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025, high‑volume separator and cell production remain unvalidated, and failure to achieve manufacturable yields would likely cause the business to “likely fail.”

Ducati demonstration: proof of performance, not yet proof of scale

Technically, QuantumScape’s performance claims are impressive. In September 2025, the company and PowerCo debuted a Ducati electric race motorcycle at IAA Mobility that used QSE‑5 cells and delivered:

~844 Wh/L volumetric energy density
~12‑minute 10–80% fast charge
10C discharge in a racetrack environment

Those specs come from Business Wire, Sep 8 2025, and they underscore why OEMs are still paying attention to solid‑state despite EV‑market noise. Ducati, part of the VW Group, will be a flagship field‑test program in 2026, providing real‑world data on durability, safety, and fast charging.

But for shareholders, it’s important to separate performance proof from economic proof:

Ducati is a low‑volume, halo application—great for marketing and for validating physics.
It does not by itself demonstrate that Cobra/Eagle can deliver millions of automotive‑grade cells at acceptable cost and yield.

PowerCo: the core commercial anchor

Volkswagen’s battery subsidiary PowerCo is the linchpin of QuantumScape’s business model:

PowerCo has non‑exclusive rights to manufacture up to 40 GWh/year of QS‑based cells, expandable to 80 GWh/year plus an additional 5 GWh/year, per Volkswagen Group, Jul 11 2024 and the expanded July 23 2025 collaboration.
The commercial framework includes:
A $130M pre‑paid royalty once technical and licensing milestones are met
Up to $131M of additional milestone payments over roughly two years
Ongoing royalties per GWh on future QS‑enabled production

These milestone payments currently show up as “customer billings” and are recognized as related‑party liabilities, rather than revenue, per the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025 and the Q3 2025 Fintool transcript.

In Q3 2025, QuantumScape reported $12.8M in customer billings, largely from PowerCo. That’s a useful leading indicator of partner engagement, but it’s not recurring product revenue and can be lumpy depending on milestone timing.

Financial reality check: big cash, big burn, no margin of safety

On the surface, QuantumScape’s balance sheet looks comfortable. Management has emphasized that:

Liquidity stood around $1.0B at Q3 2025
Net debt was negative by roughly $47M
Cash runway is guided “through 2029” assuming planned milestones and spending, as discussed in the Q3 2025 Fintool transcript and the Q2 2025 shareholder letter via MarketScreener.

That sounds reassuring, but two caveats matter for value‑oriented investors:

1. The company is entirely pre‑revenue.

In Q1 2025, QuantumScape reported no GAAP revenue, an operating loss of ~$124M, and a net loss of ~$114M (EPS -$0.21), according to the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025.
By Q3 2025, operating income was still -$115M and net income -$106M (EPS -$0.18), with free cash flow around -$73.6M for the quarter, per [Financials (FMP)] and the 10‑Q (2025).

2. There is no asset‑based or earnings‑based downside support.

The company has accumulated a ~$3.5B deficit since inception, per the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025.
There are no contracted long‑term revenues, and no meaningful tangible assets that could anchor valuation if the technology path fails.

From a classic value‑investing framework, we would say QuantumScape has no fundamental margin of safety at the business level. Equity holders are fully exposed to:

Technology and manufacturability risk (Cobra/Eagle, ceramic supply)
Partner and concentration risk (Volkswagen/PowerCo, Ducati, one “new OEM”)
EV‑cycle risk (BEV adoption vs hybrids, regulatory and policy shifts)

In our one‑pager, we rate the stock a “POTENTIAL SELL” with 3.5/5 conviction, and outline the following price framework:

Base case (45% probability): $9 per share
Bear case (30% probability): $5 per share
Bull case (25% probability): $15 per share

At about $8.85 today, the stock is trading very close to our base‑case value, while offering substantial downside if things go wrong and a longer‑dated, lower‑probability upside if everything goes right.

Is QS stock a buy, sell, or hold heading into 2027?

How the market is currently pricing QuantumScape

The market narrative, as reflected in outlets like MarketWatch, The Motley Fool, and Investor’s Business Daily, frames QuantumScape as:

A central—but highly speculative—play on solid‑state EV batteries
A momentum‑driven “battleground stock” that swings hard around milestones like Cobra news and Ducati demos
A name where meaningful revenue is now openly pushed into 2027 and beyond

Coverage in mid‑2025 focused on the “breakthrough” Cobra manufacturing update and surging share price, as highlighted by Yahoo Finance, Jun 2025. More recent commentary emphasizes:

Extreme volatility: triple‑digit year‑to‑date gains followed by a >30% drawdown in November 2025, per Zacks/Yahoo Finance, Nov 2025
Concerns about scalability and economics, not just lab performance, as discussed by AInvest, Dec 2025
The link between QS’s risk/reward and a softening BEV narrative, with hybrids gaining favor, per Goldman Sachs, Sep 11 2025 and MarketWatch, Dec 2025.

Market‑implied assumptions, judging from sentiment and price action, include:

Cobra‑based lines will scale reliably to high‑volume QSE‑5 output in the next 12–24 months
At least one major OEM (very likely VW/PowerCo) will progress to field tests with clear order or capacity commitments
“Meaningful” revenue will start showing up by around 2027, per long‑form commentary in The Motley Fool, Nov 2025 and Investor’s Business Daily, Nov 2025

We think those assumptions are aggressive, especially given that:

High‑volume manufacturing is unproven and management itself stresses the risk in its SEC filings
The EV adoption curve has flattened in some key markets, and hybrids are gaining share
QuantumScape’s entire licensing model is concentrated around Volkswagen and a handful of early partners

Our verdict on the stock at ~$8.85

Putting it together:

The bull case—stable yields on Eagle lines, Ducati and other tests showing >800 Wh/L and robust cycle life, plus PowerCo executing on its license with a visible 2028 ramp—can support $15 per share in our framework.
The bear case—Cobra/Eagle scale‑up stalling, Ducati tests slipping, and PowerCo delaying or shrinking its license—can justify $5 per share or worse.
The base case, which we think is roughly balanced around a 45% probability, comes out around $9 per share, almost exactly where the stock trades today.

For new capital with a 6–12 month horizon, this setup is not attractive:

Upside is longer‑dated and highly contingent.
Near‑term returns are driven by headlines, not fundamentals.
There is no margin of safety if things go sideways; impairment risk is real.

For existing holders, we view QuantumScape as:

More of a trading vehicle around well‑telegraphed milestones
Than a core long‑term compounder at the current valuation

Our one‑pager suggests:

“Trim Above”: $12 per share
“Attractive Entry”: around $6.50 per share
“Re‑assessment window”: 6–12 months, keyed to manufacturing progress and OEM commitments

Will QuantumScape deliver long‑term growth—or is this optionality overpriced?

The long‑term bull case rests on four main pillars.

1. A differentiated technology and IP position

QuantumScape’s core moat is its ceramic solid‑state separator and the associated process IP. Management claims this separator allows:

Anode‑free lithium‑metal designs
High current densities at room temperature
Strong safety characteristics vs flammable electrolytes

This is backed by roughly 350 issued and pending patents, as summarized in the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025 and in the 10‑K (2025). Process know‑how around the Cobra heat‑treatment and Eagle line automation, combined with ceramics expertise from Corning and Murata, deepens this moat, per QuantumScape, Jun 24 2025, QuantumScape, Sep 30 2025, and Murata, Oct 8 2025.

The Ducati performance results and VW/PowerCo’s willingness to commit to potential 80+ GWh/year of capacity, plus up to $261M in pre‑paid royalties and milestones, are strong external validations of that IP position.

2. A capital‑light model in a capex‑heavy industry

Traditional battery makers like CATL, LG Energy Solution, and Panasonic sink billions into gigafactories and then earn thin but steady manufacturing margins. QuantumScape is trying to flip that script:

Focus its own capital on R&D, process development, and pilot equipment
Offload gigafactory capex and much of execution risk to partners like PowerCo, Corning, Murata
Monetize primarily via royalties and milestone payments

This is visible in the company’s modest capex relative to its ambitions: Q3 2025 capex was only about $9.9M, with full‑year 2025 capex guided at $30–40M, according to the Q3 2025 Motley Fool transcript and [Financials (FMP)]. At scale, successful licensing could mean:

Higher returns on invested capital at the IP layer
Less balance‑sheet risk from excess manufacturing capacity

But this comes with trade‑offs: less revenue per kWh and heavy dependency on partner execution and willingness to keep funding programs through the cycle.

3. Structural EV tailwinds—despite near‑term noise

Macroelectric‑vehicle sentiment has cooled as growth in BEV sales slowed and hybrids gained share, particularly in Europe and the US, as covered by Goldman Sachs, Sep 11 2025 and TechRadar, Jan 2026. For a high‑beta name like QuantumScape, this macro pivot has real consequences: delays in premium BEV launches, shifting capex, and more cautious R&D budgets.

Longer term, though, the IEA’s Global EV Outlook 2025 still projects rising EV penetration supported by regulatory pushes and eventual ICE phase‑outs. That keeps solid‑state and other advanced chemistries on OEM roadmaps as strategic options for:

Extending range
Reducing charging friction
Differentiating premium models

If QuantumScape can prove both performance and manufacturability, those tailwinds should gradually enlarge its addressable royalty pool—even if the timing is bumpy.

4. Management and capital allocation discipline (with a caveat)

We give management credit for:

Pivoting from a capex‑heavy JV with VW to a licensing model
Hitting key 2024–25 technical milestones—Cobra baseline production, B1 QSE‑5 shipments, Ducati demo—largely on the timelines communicated, per QuantumScape, Dec 5 2024, Jun 24 2025, and Oct 22 2025.
Keeping leverage off the balance sheet and raising equity opportunistically through an at‑the‑market program that brought in $263.5M before expiring in August 2025, per the Q3 2025 Fintool transcript.

Corporate governance is mixed but not terrible:

VW is the largest shareholder and can designate two directors, per Electrive, Jul 25 2025, creating both strategic alignment and potential conflicts.
The board has separated CEO and chair roles and implemented an “External Performance Award” tying a large chunk of executive comp to stock price and business milestones, per the DEF 14A (2025).

One red flag we note is insider selling. In December 2025, director Dipender Saluja sold roughly 3.3M Class A shares across two days (about a quarter of his indirect holdings), with trades coded as discretionary sales rather than automatic tax‑related actions. That pattern, documented in recent Forms 4 and summarized in our insider‑trading analysis, isn’t a thesis‑killer by itself, but it reinforces our view that insiders are happy to de‑risk personal exposure when the stock rallies.

For investors trying to track complex governance and capital‑allocation patterns across dozens of names, Read our AI-powered value investing guide to see how tools like DeepValue can turn days of manual work with proxies, 10‑Ks, and transcripts into a standardized, citation‑backed view in minutes.

Use DeepValue to run parallel deep research on QuantumScape and competing EV battery plays, with every claim fully cited so you can “trust but verify” your own thesis.

See the Full Analysis →

What could go wrong? The main thesis breakers and early warning signs

Given the lack of downside protection, identifying what breaks the story is crucial.

Key thesis breakers

We see three primary failure modes:

1. Manufacturing scale‑up fails or stalls.

Cobra or Eagle processes might not reach stable automotive‑grade yields despite continued investment.
That would prevent QuantumScape from transferring a manufacturable process to licensees and would jeopardize milestone and royalty inflows.
Management itself highlights this risk repeatedly in the 10‑Q (2025), Mar 31 2025.

2. Field testing reveals durability or safety problems.

If Ducati or other OEM field tests in 2026 show poor cycle life, dendrite formation, or safety incidents, programs may be delayed, scaled back, or cancelled.
That would undermine the technology narrative and reduce the willingness of partners to commit production capacity, as flagged in the Q2 2025 Investing.com transcript.

3. Volkswagen/PowerCo pulls back.

If PowerCo does not execute the IP License Agreement and trigger the $130M pre‑paid royalty by around 2027—or chooses to materially reduce QS‑related capacity plans—that would severely weaken the revenue and funding outlook.
This is arguably the single largest risk concentration, per the original VW‑PowerCo deal.

A fourth, more external risk is that a competitor like Toyota or a CATL‑linked solid‑state program wins a high‑volume automotive award with comparable performance and earlier industrialization economics, as discussed in Autoweek, Sep 2025. If VW or other OEMs standardize on a rival chemistry, QuantumScape’s IP value could erode even if its cells work well in isolation.

What we’re watching over the next 6–18 months

Our risk‑monitoring checklist includes:

Customer billings trend:

If trailing‑12‑month billings don’t climb meaningfully above the Q3 2025 level of $12.8M by mid‑2026, even as management continues to reference up to $131M in PowerCo milestones, we’ll downgrade the probability and timing of monetization, as noted by Zacks, Nov 4 2025 and Nasdaq’s coverage of the same data.

Eagle Line and B1 shipments:

Upcoming 10‑Qs and 10‑Ks need to show tangible progress on Eagle installation, automation status, yields, and B1 shipment cadence. Lack of detail would be a warning that manufacturability risk is not resolving as planned.

Corning and Murata updates:

If we don’t see defined pilot capacities or pre‑production line announcements from Corning and Murata over 12–18 months, that suggests difficulties in scaling separator manufacturing, per the joint‑development announcements in QuantumScape, Sep 30 2025 and Murata, Oct 8 2025.

EV market data and OEM commentary:

If upcoming IEA and OEM data show BEV share stagnating or declining for multiple years and management commentary at major automakers shifts decisively toward hybrids and cost‑down LFP packs, we’ll cut our long‑term royalty assumptions and reassess whether QS still deserves speculative capital at its then‑current valuation. Relevant benchmarks include the IEA’s Global EV Outlook 2025 and ongoing coverage like MarketWatch, Dec 2025.

How we’d think about position sizing and timing

Given the asymmetric risk profile, we see QuantumScape as an option‑like satellite position, not a core holding, for most investors:

Position sizes should assume a non‑trivial probability of permanent capital loss.
Entries above our “Trim Above” level of $12 offer poor risk/reward; entries closer to or below our “Attractive Entry” of $6.50 provide a more compelling skew, especially if accompanied by positive manufacturing and OEM data.
Time horizon matters: investors who need fundamentals‑driven returns within 6–12 months are likely to be disappointed, as 2026 will still be dominated by pilot lines, field tests, and billings—not royalties or earnings.

Traders who specialize in milestone‑driven volatility may see QuantumScape as fertile ground, with highly visible upcoming events around Eagle, Ducati testing, and PowerCo milestones. But long‑only value investors should treat the stock with caution at current levels and wait for either:

Lower prices that better compensate for technology and partner risk, or
Clearer, independently verifiable evidence of manufacturability and contractual production commitments.

Final thoughts

QuantumScape sits at the intersection of three powerful forces: the push for better EV batteries, the harsh realities of manufacturing physics at scale, and the constraints of capital markets. Its technology is legitimately exciting, its OEM relationships are enviable, and its licensing model is clever. But at roughly $5.3B in market value with no revenue yet, investors are paying up front for a future that still needs to be proven in factories and on test tracks—not just in press releases.

Our work points to a roughly balanced base case around today’s price, with substantial downside if scale‑up or OEM enthusiasm falters and longer‑dated upside if everything goes right. That’s not the setup we look for when allocating fresh long‑term capital. For now, we’d rather keep QuantumScape on our watchlist, monitor Cobra/Eagle and Ducati results closely, and be patient for either a better entry or more tangible evidence that the royalty machine is real.

If you’re evaluating whether to hold, trim, or initiate a position in QS and want to apply the same structured process across a portfolio of other complex, pre‑revenue names, you don’t need to build a research team from scratch.

Let DeepValue’s AI agent parse QuantumScape’s 10‑Ks, 10‑Qs, and industry sources to surface the key risks, catalysts, and valuation scenarios before you put capital at risk.

Research QS in Minutes →

QuantumScape (QS) Deep Research Report: Overvalued Optionality or Early-Mover Edge in Solid-State EV Batteries?