DeepValue - Deep Research for Stocks | Institutional Intelligence at Scale

Northfield Bancorp is a community bank that screens cheap, throws off a solid dividend, and yet never quite seems to capture investor excitement. It sits in the crowded New York/New Jersey banking market, leans heavily on commercial real estate (CRE) and multifamily, and has had to navigate one of the toughest rate cycles community banks have seen in years.

From our deep dive into the latest 10‑K and 10‑Q, plus recent investor relations updates, we think the story is more nuanced than “sleepy yield bank.” According to the 10‑K (2025), p.6, Northfield runs a classic spread-driven model out of 37 branches with about $5.7 billion in assets, anchored in New York and New Jersey. That sounds plain vanilla, but under the hood you have a CRE‑heavy loan book, meaningful interest‑rate sensitivity, and a management team aggressively returning capital while trying to de‑risk CRE.

At roughly $11.84 per share, the stock trades around 0.65x book and 11.9x trailing earnings with a 4.4% dividend yield, based on data summarized in the valuation section of the 10‑K (2025), p.24 and the key ratios in our report. The market is effectively saying: “We don’t fully trust the CRE book or the rate profile, but we’ll pay for the dividend and modest improvement.” Our job is to decide whether that skepticism is overdone.

If you’re spending hours trying to reconcile earnings releases, SEC filings, and scattered industry commentary for banks like Northfield, you’re not alone; we built our process precisely to compress that research timeline.

Use DeepValue’s AI-driven engine to turn dense 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and niche CRE commentary into a structured, citation-backed bank thesis in minutes instead of days.

Research NFBK in Minutes →

In this piece, we’ll walk through the business model, valuation, dividend safety, and the key risks and catalysts that will drive returns over the next 6–24 months.

Northfield Bancorp: What kind of bank are you buying?

Northfield Bancorp owns and operates Northfield Bank, a community‑oriented institution serving individuals, small businesses, and municipalities across New York, New Jersey, and eastern Pennsylvania. As described in the 10‑K (2025), p.6, the bank focuses on:

Commercial and industrial (C&I) loans
Owner‑occupied commercial real estate
Multifamily and other non‑owner‑occupied CRE
Some one‑to‑four family, construction, and home‑equity lending

The balance sheet is overwhelmingly real‑estate‑centric. According to the 10‑Q (2025), p.55, 95.6% of total loans are in real estate, including:

$2.44 billion of multifamily (about 62.6% of loans)
$894.5 million of commercial mortgages (22.9%)
$175.6 million in office
$423.7 million in rent‑regulated multifamily

That concentration in New York CRE and rent‑regulated housing is the central risk investors are trying to price.

On the funding side, deposits stood at $3.97 billion at 9/30/25, with a meaningful tilt toward low‑cost transaction balances and municipal/government deposits. The 10‑Q (2025), p.48 notes:

$2.09 billion in transaction accounts
About $940 million in municipal/government deposits
Estimated net uninsured deposits of ~$944.6 million (23.8% of total)

This deposit mix is the core of Northfield’s moat: a relatively low‑cost, sticky funding base built on local relationships and municipal ties, as the company highlights in its company overview (Jan 2026).

Is NFBK stock a buy in 2026 at ~0.65x book?

From our perspective, any community bank thesis should start with three questions:

1. What is normalized earnings power?

2. How likely is permanent capital impairment?

3. Do you get paid enough (via valuation and dividends) to take the ride?

Earnings power: NIM has quietly recovered

Northfield’s earnings took a hit through 2023–24 as rising funding costs compressed spreads. Net income fell from $37.7 million in 2023 to $29.9 million in 2024, and the efficiency ratio worsened from 61.11% to 65.90%, according to the 10‑K (2025), p.48. At that point, the narrative was “margin squeeze, sluggish earnings, maybe a value trap.”

But 2025 marks a clear inflection:

NIM expanded from 2.07% for 9M‑24 to 2.50% for 9M‑25
Net interest income rose 18.7% year over year, to $100.7 million for 9M‑25
EPS improved from $0.45 to $0.70 over the same period

These figures come from the 10‑Q (2025), p.51 and Northfield’s Q3 2025 results release.

What changed?

The bank shifted earning assets into higher‑yielding agency MBS and select retail products like home equity and 1‑4 family mortgages, as outlined in the 10‑K (2025), p.56.
Brokered deposits were cut aggressively—from $263.4 million to just $30 million in 2025—replaced with core deposits and term FHLB borrowings, per the same Q3 release.
The cost of interest‑bearing liabilities moved lower, even in a high‑rate environment.

That repositioning carries rate‑risk tradeoffs (we’ll come back to that), but the bottom line is that, heading into 2026, Northfield looks capable of sustaining EPS around $0.90 in a “base case” scenario with NIM holding near 2.4–2.5%.

Valuation: what’s priced in?

At about $11.84 per share, Northfield’s key valuation metrics, drawn from our report and the 10‑K (2025), p.24, are:

P/E: ~11.9x trailing EPS of $0.72
P/B: ~0.65x
EV/EBITDA: ~9.9x
ROE: ~4.2%

On these numbers, the stock isn’t optically cheap on earnings, but it’s meaningfully discounted to book, especially for a bank with:

Community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) of 12.15% vs the 9% “well‑capitalized” threshold
Non‑performing assets just 0.33% of total assets
After‑tax unrealized securities losses of only about $12.4 million

Those datapoints are detailed in the capital and risk sections of the 10‑K (2025), p.13 and reiterated in the Q3 2025 investor update.

Our base‑case valuation work (which aligns with the scenario framework in the one‑pager) suggests:

Base case (55% probability): NIM ~2.4–2.5%, EPS around $0.90, implied value ~$14 (≈0.8x book).
Bear case (25% probability): Regulators tighten CRE capital expectations and NY CRE credit losses rise; NIM drifts below 2.3%, EPS closer to $0.65, implied value ~$10.
Bull case (20% probability): Fed easing cuts funding costs meaningfully, NIM approaches 2.7%, EPS >$1.00, implied value ~$17.

At today’s price, the market is leaning toward something between base and bear: modest earnings, okay dividend, perpetual discount to book. Our read is that there is enough probability of the base case playing out to justify a “potential buy” rating—especially if you can enter closer to $11 with a trim level in the mid‑$14s.

If your process involves sifting through several community banks at once to compare capital, NIM trajectories, and CRE concentration, consider using DeepValue to stack 10+ tickers side‑by‑side. Its parallel research engine can turn a watchlist of mispriced regionals into standardized, citation-backed reports in about five minutes, which is extremely handy in a sector where nuances in CRE books and capital rules matter.

Will Northfield Bancorp deliver long‑term dividend and book value growth?

The crux of the long‑term thesis is whether Northfield can:

Keep credit losses under control in New York CRE
Reduce CRE concentration to ease regulatory pressure
Maintain a structurally decent NIM once the easy funding wins are behind it

If those boxes get checked, modest EPS growth and capital returns should support mid‑teens total returns from here.

Dividend: attractive, but not bulletproof

Northfield pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13, or $0.52 annually. Based on roughly $0.90 in annualized EPS, coverage is decent. The payout ratio has, however, crept up:

39.5% in 2022
60.5% in 2023
72.9% in 2024

These figures are summarized in the dividend section of the 10‑K (2025), p.50. Management has also been buying back shares aggressively—$18.1 million of repurchases in 2024 and $15 million in the first nine months of 2025, according to the buyback disclosure on 10‑Q (2025), p.48.

In 9M‑25 alone, the bank returned $30.9 million via dividends and buybacks, effectively returning a large portion of earnings and then some. Yet stockholders’ equity still grew to $719.6 million by 9/30/25, boosted by net income and improving AOCI, as detailed on the same 10‑Q (2025), p.48.

Our take on the dividend:

In the base case, where NIM holds and credit stays benign, the $0.13 quarterly payout is likely sustainable over the next 12–24 months.
In stress scenarios—notably regulatory action on CRE or a spike in NPLs above 1%—the high payout and buybacks give management limited flexibility. A cut would quickly move from “unthinkable” to “probable” if EPS slipped meaningfully below the current run rate.

In other words, the dividend is attractive and presently well‑covered, but you’re being paid that 4%+ yield because you are underwriting real risk.

Book value and capital: solid starting point, but sensitive to shocks

Northfield’s capital story looks solid at first glance:

CBLR of 12.15% vs the 9% “well‑capitalized” threshold, per the 10‑K (2025), p.24.
Non‑performing loans at 0.49% of total loans and non‑performing assets at 0.33% of total assets, from the 10‑Q (2025), p.30.
After‑tax unrealized AFS/HTM securities losses of just ~$12.4 million, reflecting improved agency MBS marks as rates stabilized, as described in the rate‑risk section of the 10‑K (2025), p.38 and the Q3 2025 results commentary.

That’s a meaningful contrast versus some regionals that are still sitting on large underwater securities books.

But the filings also flag material interest‑rate sensitivity. In its rate‑shock modeling, the bank reports that a 400 bp move in either direction could shave 11–19% off net portfolio value and net interest income, per the interest‑rate risk simulations in the 10‑K (2025), p.63 and 10‑Q (2025), p.60. Add to that:

$941.7 million in borrowed funds, with $873.8 million of term borrowings at a 4% weighted‑average rate
$488.5 million of those borrowings maturing within one year

Those figures come from the funding and liquidity sections of the 10‑Q (2025), p.48 and 10‑Q (2025), p.61.

So while capital today looks fine, leverage to both the rate path and the CRE cycle is real. That’s exactly why the margin of safety is “conditional” rather than robust.

For investors trying to systematically track this kind of risk—NIM paths, CRE ratios, rate sensitivity—across multiple holdings, Read our AI-powered value investing guide. It walks through how tools like DeepValue can automate filings ingestion, parse the footnotes where these risk disclosures live, and help you scale this type of bank-by-bank analysis without drowning in PDFs.

Turn dense bank filings into a three-part, citation-backed report that surfaces NIM drivers, CRE exposure, and capital buffers across your entire watchlist.

See the Full Analysis →

CRE exposure and regulatory risk: the heart of the bear case

If Northfield simply ran a diversified loan book with modest rate risk, the stock probably wouldn’t be sitting at 0.65x book. The big overhang is CRE concentration and the potential regulatory and credit fallout.

CRE concentration metrics to watch

Regulators generally treat non‑owner‑occupied CRE above 300% of risk‑based capital as elevated. Northfield has been well above that line:

456% in mid‑2024
406% by Q3 2025

These numbers are disclosed in the company’s regional CRE commentary in the Q2 2024 results release and reiterated in the Q3 2025 release.

Management is actively trying to bring this ratio down toward 300–350% over the next 6–18 months. Progress here is central to our bull/base case: if they can de‑risk the loan mix gradually without sacrificing NIM or incurring large losses, the regulatory pressure should ease and the stock can re‑rate closer to 0.8x book.

Credit risks within New York office and rent‑regulated multifamily

Within the CRE bucket, two subsectors draw the most scrutiny:

Office: $175.6 million exposure
Rent‑regulated multifamily: $423.7 million exposure

These balances are disclosed in the portfolio breakdown in the 10‑Q (2025), p.47 and 10‑Q (2025), p.56. Management has highlighted a large Staten Island office credit as a focus point, and they are watching refinancing and repricing dynamics in the rent‑regulated multifamily book closely.

So far, reported credit metrics are benign:

Non‑performing loans at 0.49% of total
Net charge‑offs low and mostly tied to a shrinking unsecured small‑business C&I portfolio

These datapoints appear in the allowance for credit losses and NPL/NCO disclosures in the 10‑Q (2025), p.30 and 10‑K (2025), p.56.

But the risk is forward‑looking: if NY office valuations and rent‑regulated multifamily cash flows deteriorate further, non‑performing loans could climb above 1–1.5% of total loans, forcing higher CECL provisions on that $599.3 million combined office + rent‑regulated exposure. The bank itself acknowledges that a sustained downturn in local CRE could materially affect delinquencies and losses in the risk‑factors section of the 10‑K (2025), p.36.

Regulatory scenarios that would break the thesis

The 10‑K and 10‑Q language on supervision is unusually frank. In the capital and regulatory sections of the 10‑K (2025), p.34 and the 10‑Q (2025), p.47, management explicitly notes that:

Higher capital buffers could be required because of CRE concentrations
Supervisors could constrain dividends and buybacks if they view risk levels as elevated

Our “thesis breaker” scenarios are therefore very specific:

By end‑2026, regulators force NFBK (through exam findings, MOU, or similar) to rapidly cut non‑owner‑occupied CRE / risk‑based capital below 300%, or to hold materially higher capital, resulting in suspended buybacks and a dividend cut.
By late‑2026, NPLs exceed 1.5% and net charge‑offs run at >0.5% for at least two quarters, driven by NY office and rent‑regulated multifamily.
NIM drops below 2.25% for two quarters without a major macro shock, signaling that the balance‑sheet repositioning has failed to deliver sustainable spread.

If any of these unfold, we would no longer consider Northfield a “potential buy” at current levels; in those worlds, the discount to book is not wide enough to offset the probability of permanent capital impairment.

How does the market see Northfield today?

Market sentiment around Northfield has subtly shifted over the past year.

Earlier 2025 coverage emphasized positive surprises: earnings beats, margin expansion, and improving efficiency. For example, a Nasdaq article on Q2 2025 results highlighted profit growth and NIM expansion, while BeyondSPX’s Q1 2025 recap focused squarely on spread improvement and asset quality.

More recently, the tone has shifted toward:

Stable dividend payer with a “very attractive” valuation grade
Modestly undervalued regional bank rather than a high‑conviction alpha story

You can see this in services like MarketsMojo, which framed the stock as undervalued with lagging performance versus indices in October 2025, and MarketBeat’s October 2025 dividend piece, which leaned on the stable dividend angle.

Ownership and sell‑side positioning tell a similar story:

The State of New Jersey’s pension fund trimmed its stake while other institutions added, per American Banking News (Nov 2025).
Arrowstreet Capital disclosed a $6.86 million stake, suggesting selective institutional interest, according to Defense World (Dec 2025).
Sell‑side ratings cluster around Hold/Market Perform, with at least one target cut, as noted by American Banking News (Nov 2025).

In other words, the stock is on investors’ radar, screens as cheap, but lacks a strong sponsorship base or an obvious near‑term catalyst for a major re‑rating. That’s not necessarily bad for value investors; it just means you aren’t front‑running a crowded consensus.

Key catalysts and checkpoints for 2026 investors

With a name like Northfield, you’re not betting on a breakout growth story; you’re betting on a sequence of mostly boring, but important, checkpoints breaking in your favor.

Near‑term (0–6 months)

Three things to watch over the next couple of quarters:

1. Q4‑25 and Q1‑26 results:

Does NIM stay at or above ~2.5% as deposit costs stabilize and $488.5 million of near‑term borrowings mature?
The 10‑Q (2025), p.51 gives the baseline: NIM at 2.50% with funding costs already easing.
If NIM dips below ~2.45% without a compelling one‑off explanation, we’d treat the margin recovery as fragile and dial back conviction.

2. 2025 10‑K release:

Any change in language around CRE concentrations, capital buffers, or dividend constraints in the risk and capital sections would be revealing. The current framing in the 10‑K (2025), p.34 and 10‑Q (2025), p.47 already hints at supervisory attention; we’re watching for escalation.

3. Board decision on buyback authorization:

Existing repurchase programs are effectively exhausted, as disclosed on 10‑Q (2025), p.48.
Renewing or expanding buybacks at current valuation would signal management confidence in both regulatory posture and underlying credit quality.

Medium‑term (6–18 months)

Over the next year and a half, our checklist includes:

CRE de‑risking: Non‑owner‑occupied CRE / risk‑based capital needs to trend from 406% toward or below 300–350%. Failure to make progress raises the odds of regulatory constraints later.
Office and rent‑regulated loans: We’re watching the performance of that $175.6 million office portfolio and the $423.7 million rent‑regulated multifamily book as they refinance or reprice, using disclosures in future 10‑Qs and the SEC 8‑K (2025) as reference points for any material developments.
Dividend sustainability: As CECL provisions normalize and one‑off gains fade, can the bank keep the payout ratio in a mid‑50s–60s% range without stressing capital? The income statement and dividend history in the 10‑K (2025), p.50 will be the yardstick.

Long‑term (2–5 years)

Longer term, we’ll be judging whether management can:

Shift mix toward more C&I and owner‑occupied CRE, reducing dependence on high‑risk multifamily and rent‑regulated exposure, as outlined in the strategy discussion on 10‑K (2025), p.6 and the March 2025 10‑Q.
Maintain a resilient NIM without repeated one‑time boosts from funding mix shifts or securities repositioning, referencing the interest‑rate discussions in the 10‑K (2025), p.38.
Improve the efficiency ratio back toward pre‑2022 levels through smart branch optimization and digital investments, as mentioned in the operating strategy sections on 10‑K (2025), p.35 and 10‑K (2025), p.50.

So what should investors do with NFBK now?

Pulling it all together, here’s how we frame Northfield Bancorp:

At ~0.65x book, with a 4.4% dividend yield and improving NIM, the stock is modestly undervalued if you believe credit and regulation stay manageable.
The bank’s funding franchise is genuinely valuable: low‑cost core deposits, shrinking brokered balances, and a relationship‑driven model that compares favorably to some CRE‑heavy peers still paying up for funding.
The risk is concentrated: New York office and rent‑regulated multifamily, elevated CRE concentration ratios, and meaningful rate sensitivity. These are exactly the type of exposures that can take years to play out.

Our internal rating sits at “POTENTIAL BUY” with medium conviction (3.5/5):

We see a base‑case fair value around $14 (roughly 0.8x book), plus dividend income, which would deliver low‑teens to high‑teens total returns over 12–24 months.
We think $11 and below is an attractive entry zone, where the risk/reward skews more favorably.
We would look to trim above ~$14.50, where the discount to book has narrowed and you’re less well‑compensated for the underlying CRE and regulatory risk.

Position sizing is key. This is not a “bet the farm” idea, but rather a name that can sit alongside other regional banks in a diversified portfolio, with exposure calibrated to:

Your comfort with New York CRE cycles
Your view on Fed policy and rate volatility
Your tolerance for potential dividend and buyback volatility if regulators turn more conservative

If you want to apply this kind of structured, risk-aware lens across a basket of community and regional banks,

Let DeepValue’s deep research agent parse 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and niche CRE sources so you can compare 10+ banks’ risk/return profiles in one standardized view.

Start Researching Now →

Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) Deep Research Report: Priced for a Slow Grind Higher or Still Discounting Too Much Risk?